Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
  • Geological Society of London Publications
    • Engineering Geology Special Publications
    • Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
    • Journal of Micropalaeontology
    • Journal of the Geological Society
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Memoirs
    • Petroleum Geology Conference Series
    • Petroleum Geoscience
    • Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
    • Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
    • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society
    • Scottish Journal of Geology
    • Special Publications
    • Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow
    • Transactions of the Geological Society of London
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow gsl on Twitter
  • Visit gsl on Facebook
  • Visit gsl on Youtube
  • Visit gsl on Linkedin
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society

Advanced search

  • Home
    • Journal home
    • Lyell Collection home
    • Geological Society home
  • Content
    • Online First
    • Issue in progress
    • All issues
    • Thematic Collections
    • Supplementary publications
    • Open Access
  • Subscribe
    • GSL fellows
    • Institutions
    • Corporate
    • Other member types
  • Info
    • Authors
    • Librarians
    • Readers
    • GSL Fellows access
    • Other member types access
    • Press office
    • Accessibility
    • Help
    • Metrics
  • Alert sign up
    • eTOC alerts
    • Online First alerts
    • RSS feeds
    • Newsletters
    • GSL blog
  • Submit

Age of the Acadian deformation and Devonian granites in northern England: a review

Nigel H. Woodcock, N. Jack Soper and Andrew J. Miles
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 62, 238-253, 8 April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2018-009
Nigel H. Woodcock
1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nhw1@cam.ac.uk
N. Jack Soper
2Gams Bank, Threshfield, Skipton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Miles
3School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, University Road, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Field evidence shows that emplacement of Devonian granites in northern England overlaps in space and time with the end of the supposed Acadian deformation in their country rocks. The age of this Acadian event in England and Wales is in need of review because of revised Rb-Sr and K-Ar decay constants and recently acquired radiometric ages on the granites.

Published K-Ar and Ar-Ar cleavage ages recalculated to the new decay constants range from 404 to 394 Ma (Emsian, Early Devonian). Emplacement of the Skiddaw and Weardale granites at 398.8 ± 0.4 and 399.3 ± 0.7 Ma respectively is indicated by U-Pb zircon ages, and is compatible with the field evidence. However, emplacement of the Shap Granite at a Re-Os molybdenite age of 405.2 ± 1.8 Ma and at the youngest U-Pb zircon age of 403 ± 8 Ma matches the field evidence less well. The apparent paradox in these ages is resolved if the K-Ar ages record only the end of millions of years of cleavage formation. An earlier cluster of K-Ar and Ar-Ar cleavage ages at 426–420 Ma (Ludlow to Přídolí, late Silurian) dates a pre-Acadian resetting event soon after Iapetus closure, an event of uncertain significance.

Ion microprobe U-Pb zircon ages for the Shap Granite have a mean of 415.6 ± 1.4 Ma but a range of 428–403 Ma, compatible with a long magmatic history. Thermal considerations suggest that this history was not at the upper crustal emplacement site but in a mid-crustal mush zone, now preserved at about 10 km depth as a component of the Lake District and North Pennine batholiths.

The Lower Palaeozoic rocks of northern England and Wales were mainly deformed by folds and cleavage assigned to the Acadian phase of the Caledonian Orogeny (Soper et al. 1987; McKerrow et al. 2000). When first applied in Britain, this name implied a time correlation with the type Acadian event of Devonian age in the northern Appalachians (van Staal et al. 1998). The age of the Acadian event in England and Wales has been constrained by a mid-Emsian to Givetian (Devonian) unconformity, by radiometric dating of cleavage-parallel micas, and by radiometric ages of granites shown to be emplaced during the later stages of deformation (reviews by Woodcock & Soper 2006; Woodcock et al. 2007; Woodcock 2012). An age range of 400–390 Ma (mid-Emsian to mid-Eifelian, Devonian) for the Acadian deformation event has been considered to fit the integrated evidence best.

Now, four developments prompt a revision of the Acadian age estimate.

  1. Revised decay constants for the K-Ar and Rb-Sr systems require recalculation of existing cleavage ages and some granite ages.

  2. Further radiometric ages on the Shap, Skiddaw and Weardale granites have become available.

  3. Some of the recently acquired U-Pb ages on magmatic zircons in the Shap Granite pre-date the estimated age of its upper-crustal emplacement.

  4. A pre-Devonian component to the main cleavage in northern England and Wales needs consideration in the light of late Silurian ages from the main cleavage in the English Midlands.

Dating the Acadian deformation in Britain and Ireland is also important in the light of continued attempts to correlate tectonic terranes between the Appalachians and the Caledonides. For instance, Waldron et al. (2014) have used detrital zircon ages to strengthen the correlation between the Leinster–Lakesman terrane and the Ganderia terrane in the Appalachians (Fig. 1b). Fritschle et al. (2018) have proposed a late Middle Ordovician rather than a Devonian age for the D1 cleavage in SE Ireland and the Isle of Man and, by implication, elsewhere in the Caledonian sector of Ganderia. Further SE, Waldron et al. (2011) and Pothier et al. (2015) have used detrital zircon dating to match components of the Avalon terrane of England and Wales with the Meguma terrane of Nova Scotia (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(a) Geology of the Iapetus Suture zone, showing the Devonian granites of northern England in the context of the other Trans-Suture Suite granites. Most boundaries from British Geological Survey (1996); subsurface granite contours from Kimbell et al. (2010). (b) Palaeocontinental setting of map 1(a) showing the main Appalachian and Caledonian tectonics domains; modified from Waldron et al. (2014).

Despite these proposed long-range terrane correlations, all four of the above studies have recognized that the correlations are imperfect and require marked non-cylindricity in the terrane organization along the Appalachian–Caledonian orogen. Since the export of the term ‘Acadian’ from the Appalachians to the Caledonides, it has also become evident that Acadian events in the two sectors may correlate poorly both in time and by formation mechanism. So Woodcock et al. (2007) attributed the Acadian deformation in the Caledonides to collision of Iberia/Armorica with Avalonia at about 400–390 Ma. By contrast the Acadian event in the Appalachians is now ascribed to accretion of Avalonia to Ganderia at about 420–400 Ma (Fig. 1b), followed by a Neoacadian event due to accretion of Meguma with Ganderia at 395–350 Ma (van Staal et al. 2009; Wilson et al. 2017).

It is important to stress therefore that references in this paper to the Acadian event and its age apply to the England and Wales sector of the orogeny only unless otherwise specified. Correlation with other parts of the Caledonides will be discussed at the end of the paper, but better correlation with the Appalachians will not be attempted.

Regional geological setting

The pre-Upper Devonian geological context of northern England is shown in Figure 1a. This area is bisected by the Iapetus Suture, which separates terranes with Laurentian affinity to the NW from those to the SE derived from Gondwana. The intervening Iapetus Ocean closed in mid- to late Silurian time. Bordering the suture on the Laurentian side is the Central–Southern Uplands terrane, mainly Lower Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks that formed a deep marine accretionary complex above the NW dipping Iapetus subduction zone (Leggett et al. 1979). On the Gondwanan side of the suture is the Leinster–Lakesman terrane, comprising Lower Palaeozoic sedimentary sequences that include Ordovician magmatic arc rocks. This terrane has been correlated with the Appalachian Ganderia domain (e.g. Waldron et al. 2014; Fritschle et al. 2018), as has the adjacent Monian composite terrane, which contains also Neoproterozoic basement rocks. Whether the Monian terrane continues eastward beneath the Upper Palaeozoic cover of northern England or wedges out in that direction is uncertain (Fig. 1a).

To the SE of the Monian terrane is the Avalon composite terrane, amalgamated with the Monian terrane in early Ordovician (Floian) time. On Avalonia, Cambrian to Lower Devonian sedimentary rocks with Ordovician volcanic rocks rest on a Neoproterozoic basement. Detrital zircon and stratigraphic correlations have suggested to Waldron et al. (2011) that the Cambrian sequences in North Wales match those in the Meguma terrane of Nova Scotia. On this hypothesis, Megumia and Avalonia were also amalgamated by early Ordovician (Floian) time.

The Acadian deformation of Devonian (Emsian–Eifelian) age is recognized in the terranes SE of the Iapetus Suture (reviews by Woodcock & Soper 2006; Woodcock 2012). The deformation is dominated by upright folds trending between NE–SW and east–west, with a steep slaty cleavage that is axial planar or weakly clockwise-transecting to the folds (Soper et al. 1987; review by Woodcock & Soper 2006). The main Acadian deformation is sporadically affected by a later, gently dipping crenulation cleavage and related folds, particularly in the Isle of Man and the northern part of the Lake District. The Acadian deformation can be traced into Ireland, but the deformation history there is complicated by recognition of a late Middle Ordovician event of uncertain extent (Fritschle et al. 2018). The Laurentian margin accretionary complex (the Scottish Southern Uplands terrane and the Central terrane in Ireland) was formed diachronously from late Ordovician to Wenlock time, although localized Devonian (possibly Acadian) deformation occurs on the Moniaive shear zone (review by Stone et al. 2012).

Granites of the Trans-Suture Suite were intruded in a zone about 100 km wide either side of the Iapetus suture (Fig. 1a) about 20 myr after Iapetus had closed (Brown et al. 2008). The debate about this spatial and temporal pattern has been summarized by Miles et al. (2016), who favoured an origin by crustal melting above a zone of delaminated lithosphere due to drop-off of the subducting Iapetus slab.

The geology of Northern England

The outcrop geology of northern England (Fig. 2) is dominated by Late Devonian and younger sedimentary rocks deposited above the angular unconformity that records uplift and erosion during and after the Acadian deformation. East of the Pennine–Dent–South Craven fault system, these post-unconformity rocks dip gently eastward towards the North Sea Mesozoic basins, complicated only by three major east–west fault belts. By contrast, in the west of the region, the post-unconformity cover wraps around the Lower Palaeozoic inlier of the Lake District Massif, upfaulted at its western flank against the Mesozoic Irish Sea Basin. Small Lower Palaeozoic inliers occur along the uplifted footwalls of the North Craven and Pennine faults and in the Alston Block, confirming that components of Lake District geology continue at depth to the east of the Pennine–Dent fault system (Stone et al. 2010).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Geological map of northern England showing the outcrop geology and main faults (modified from British Geological Survey 1996) overlain on thickness contours of subsurface granite (from Kimbell et al. 2010). Location of map shown on Figure 1.

Plutonic rocks crop out prominently in the western and northern Lake District (Fig. 2), but these are late Ordovician (Sandbian–Katian) intrusions coeval with the arc volcanic rocks of the Borrowdale Volcanic Group (review by Millward 2002). Ordovician plutonic rocks probably also make up some of the subsurface batholiths deduced from gravity modelling beneath the northern half of the Lake District, Wensleydale and the North Pennines (Fig. 2). The Devonian granites of interest in this paper have small areas of outcrop at Skiddaw and Shap. However metasomatic aureoles at Crummock Water and Ulpha probably overlie Devonian granites and the buried Haweswater granite could just as well be Devonian as Ordovician (Millward 2002). Gravity modelling (Kimbell et al. 2010) shows that the Skiddaw and Shap plutons are steep-sided vertical cylinders rooting into the tabular Lake District batholith at 8–10 km depth. The same modelling defines the North Pennine batholith to the east, which provides the roots for similar cylindrical plutons. One of these plutons – the Weardale Granite – has yielded Devonian ages from borehole samples (Selby et al. 2008; Kimbell et al. 2010).

The pluton referred to most frequently in this paper is that at Shap (Fig. 3). The country rock to the Shap granite comprises the Borrowdale Volcanic Group and sedimentary rocks of the Windermere Supergroup, which were already steeply dipping at the time of granite emplacement. The pluton was emplaced mostly into the Borrowdale Volcanic Group, with a contact aureole that pervades the lower few units of the Windermere Supergroup. The emplacing granite may have exploited a pre-existing fault network, and is cut by at least one north–south striking fault. The Acadian cleavage in the country rocks is deflected around the pluton from its regional NE–SW strike.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Geological map of the area around the Shap pluton. Location marked on Figure 2. Based on British Geological Survey (2004, 2007), with granite thickness contours from Kimbell et al. (2010)

Field relations of the Trans-Suture granite plutons

The field relations around an idealised Trans-Suture pluton are shown schematically in Figure 4. Key relations for most individual plutons are summarized by Brown et al. (2008) and for the Southern Uplands terrane by Hines et al. (2018), and are not repeated here. Rather, the main pluton attributes are discussed below with particular reference to the northern England examples. It must be emphasized that, of these examples, only the Shap and Skiddaw plutons are exposed at outcrop. The Ulpha and Crummock Water plutons are inferred from their exposed metasomatic aureoles. The plutons above the North Pennine batholith are known from gravity modelling and from two boreholes. Their original contact relations are not preserved because the plutons were partly unroofed during the post-Acadian uplift and were unconformably overlain by Carboniferous rocks.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Schematic map of the field relations in and around a typical Trans-Suture Suite pluton.

Pluton size varies for the whole Trans-Suture suite with long-axis diameters of 1–75 km (Fig. 5a) and maybe up to 150 km for the unexposed Tweeddale pluton. The northern England plutons span the middle part of this size range, with Shap, Skiddaw and the smaller North Pennine plutons at the lower (3–12 km) end, and Weardale pluton in the mid-range (20–30 km).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

(a) Plot of length v. width of Trans-Suture plutons or sub-plutons on log-log scale. Locations are on Figure 1. The length/width value is contoured. Outcrop data are from British Geological Survey (1996). Sub-surface plutons are measured at 5 km depth from Kimbell et al. (2010) and Stone et al. (2012). (b) Rose diagram of the orientation of pluton long axes scaled by long axis length, omitting the unproven Tweeddale pluton.

Pluton shape is typically ovoid, with an axial ratio mostly in the range 1.5–2.5 (Fig. 5a). The northern England plutons follow this pattern, except for the highly ovoid (5:1) Crummock Water aureole.

Pluton orientation is shown in a rose diagram, scaled by the length of the pluton. The poorly known Tweeddale pluton is omitted (Fig. 5b). The long axis of each pluton tends to be sub-parallel to the regional strike of bedding and cleavage, where this can be determined. The Skiddaw pluton, along with the Crummock and Ulpha aureoles, is elongated along strike, but the long axis of the Shap pluton is clockwise oblique by 35° (Fig. 3). The strike-parallel geometry reflects emplacement into already folded and therefore anisotropic rocks, but some post-emplacement flattening is evident.

Internal foliation is seen in some plutons only. Where present, it parallels the pluton margin. It tends to be strongest at the margin and to weaken inwards, as well documented in the Rookhope borehole into the Weardale Granite (Dunham et al. 1965). This mica fabric is likely to be deformational, but the Shap Granite locally has a weak magmatic alignment of the pink K-feldspar phenocrysts that are such a distinctive feature of the pluton. The Skiddaw pluton has a marginal sheeting and mica-foliated greisen pods.

Xenoliths are only reported in a few Trans-Suture plutons, where they tend to parallel any magmatic foliation in the granite. At Shap, sparse xenoliths can carry the S1 cleavage, disoriented with respect to country rocks (Soper & Kneller 1990), proving that a component of the cleavage pre-dated formation of part of the pluton. More common than xenoliths in some plutons are ovoid mafic enclaves (Fig. 6a), representing inclusions of coeval mafic melt that did not fully mix with the granitic magma. In the Shap pluton, these mafic enclaves are particularly common. The mafic melts entrained early-formed K-feldspar phenocrysts, proving that mafic and silicic melts co-existed.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Annotated field photographs, each with 5 cm scale bar. (a) Mafic enclave in K-spar porphyritic granite, Shap Pink Quarry [NY 558 084]. (b) Shap pluton truncating cleaved Borrowdale Volcanic Group country rock, Longfell Gill [NY 561 101]. (c) Granitic vein cutting cleaved Borrowdale Volcanic Group country rock, Longfell Gill [NY 561 101]. (d) Randomly oriented andalusite in hornfelsed Skiddaw Group aureole to Skiddaw granite, Caldew Valley, Skiddaw [NY 320 320]. (e) Hornfelsed aureole to Shap Granite overprinting cleavage in Coldwell Formation, Packhorse Hill [NY 553 075]. (f) Parkamoor dyke with marginal foliation parallel to Acadian cleavage in country rock, Low Parkamoor [SD 305 924]. (g) Contact of Stage II granite against a phenocryst-poor schlieren zone of Stage I granite, Shap Pink Quarry [NY 558 084]. (h) Contact as (g) but with a vein of Stage II granite into the schlieren zone, seen in kerbstone in Settle (Yorkshire).

Country rock fabric, comprising steep bedding and the S1 cleavage, tends to be locally truncated, particularly at the NE and SW ends of each pluton (Fig. 6b), but elsewhere it is deflected to become parallel with and wrap the pluton (Fig. 3). This geometry is well seen at Shap (Fig. 3), where emplacement must be later than the folding of bedding to steep dips and formation of some component of the steep cleavage. However, shortening must have continued for the bedding and cleavage fabrics to wrap around the consolidating pluton. At Skiddaw, contact relations are only well exposed at the northern margin of the pluton. However, the Acadian cleavage did not develop here because the country rocks had previously been hornfelsed by the Ordovician emplacement of the Carrock Fell intrusive complex.

Apophyses to the pluton and cogenetic dykes may transect (Fig. 6c) or follow the composite bedding/cleavage fabric, showing that their intrusion post-dated some component of the Acadian deformation. However, some co-genetic dykes at Shap bear a weak cleavage in their margins (Soper & Kneller 1990) (Fig. 6f), showing that their intrusion pre-dated a component of the shortening. Aplite veins in the Weardale granite have a muscovite alignment of uncertain, but possibly deformational, origin (Dunham et al. 1965).

A metamorphic aureole is present around most Trans-Suture plutons. To the NW of the suture, the S1 fabric predates mineral growth in the aureoles. In northern England, the S1 cleavage, inferred to be Acadian, predates the metasomatic aureoles at Crummock and Ulpha. At Shap, micas overgrow this cleavage, first mimetically then randomly (Boulter & Soper 1973), and calcareous siltstones are randomly recrystallized (Soper & Kneller 1990) (Fig. 6e). At Skiddaw, andalusite porphyroblasts in the aureole mostly post-date S1 (Fig. 6d), but porphyroblasts in the inner aureole zones are partly wrapped by the continuing development of the deformation fabric (Soper & Roberts 1971). The aureole minerals pre-date the sub-horizontal S2 crenulation cleavage.

In summary, the evidence from the exposed Trans-Suture plutons of northern England indicates that the plutons were emplaced during the later stages of Acadian S1 cleavage formation (Brown et al. 2008), but before that shortening deformation had ended completely. Consequently, radiometric ages from the granites are an important factor in constraining the age of the Acadian deformation event, for which radiometric ages are limited.

Dating Acadian deformation

Stratigraphic constraints on the age of the Acadian deformation

Soper et al. (1987) assembled the evidence that the angular unconformity marking syn- and post-Acadian uplift across England, Wales and Ireland is intra-Devonian rather than end-Silurian. The stratigraphic constraints on this unconformity are summarized on Figure 7.

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Summary of key events relevant to the dating of the Acadian deformation in England and Wales. Evidence for Acadian unconformity updated from Woodcock et al. (2007) and Woodcock (2012).

The Acadian deformation is most intense in the former Lower Palaeozoic basinal rocks across Wales and throughout the Leinster–Lakesman terrane. Here, Mid-Devonian or later sedimentary units unconformably overlie folded and cleaved marine Cambrian to Silurian or Lower Devonian rocks. In northern England, the unconformity spans all of Early to Mid Devonian time, although the metamorphic grade below the unconformity implies a missing Lower Devonian cover at least 3.5 km thick (Soper & Woodcock 2003). The Midland Platform in SE Wales escaped intense Acadian deformation, but still preserves a gentle angular unconformity spanning at least intra-Emsian through Frasnian time, at most 395–372 Ma (Fig. 7). Unconformities in the Dingle area of SW Ireland may constrain the Acadian deformation more tightly, perhaps to at most mid-Emsian through Eifelian time (400–388 Ma, Fig. 7), but the ages and relationships of crucial units are debated (Richmond & Williams 2000; Meere & Mulchrone 2006; Todd 2015).

An unconformity that potentially includes the Acadian event also exists beneath East Anglia (Woodcock & Pharaoh 1993), but here it spans the whole of Early and Mid-Devonian time (419–383 Ma).

Radiometric ages: presentation and decay constants

The sections that follow review radiometric age determinations from the Trans-Suture granites and from their cleaved country rocks, both regionally then locally to northern England. Regionally aggregated ages for the relevant magmatic and tectonic events are shown as probability distribution functions (Fig. 8), mostly those of Miles et al. (2016), who detail their sources and derivation method.

Fig. 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Probability distribution functions of radiometric ages from the Trans-Suture granites and related lamprophyre dykes and country rocks. Dashed curves are the unadjusted spectra for Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages. Curves a–c and f are from Miles et al. (2016), where data sources are specified. Curve (g) however incorporates new ages from Newry (Anderson 2015), Doon (Hines et al. 2018) and from Shap (Miles & Woodcock 2018). Curve (d) uses data from Hines et al. (2018) and curve (e) from Kulp et al. (1960); Brown et al. (1964, 1968); Shepherd et al. (1976) and Rundle (1982).

There is ongoing discussion of the appropriate decay constants to be used for both the Rb-Sr and K-Ar/Ar-Ar dating methods. We have used revised constants for the main age spectra, but have shown the unadjusted spectra outlined by pecked lines for comparison (Fig. 8). The K-Ar ages that use the constant of 5.543 × 10−10 a−1 (Steiger & Jäger 1977) have been adjusted upwards by the 1% suggested by Dickin (2005, pp. 275–276) and supported by comparisons with zircon U-Pb ages (Jourdan et al. 2009; Naumenko-Dèzes et al. 2018). Rb-Sr ages have been adjusted upwards by 1.9% corresponding to a lowered decay constant of 1.393 × 10−11 (Nebel et al. 2011). These adjustments are significant at the level of age resolution attempted in this paper.

Radiometric age of the Acadian cleavage

Merriman et al. (1995) have directly determined the radiometric age of the northern England cleavage from cleavage-parallel illite/mica in the Ribblesdale Inlier. These minerals gave a K-Ar age of 401 ± 7 Ma and an Ar-Ar total fusion age of 422 ± 3 Ma, both ages adjusted upwards by 1% (Fig. 8b). Merriman et al. (1995) concluded that these two ages bracketed the possible period of Acadian cleavage formation.

However, the same two age peaks occur (Fig. 8b) in Ar-Ar ages from five localities in Wales (Dong et al. 1997) suggesting that both age peaks have some discrete significance. The younger peak, at about 400 Ma (mid-Emsian, Early Devonian) is seen also in two other Welsh datasets: the K-Ar ages of Evans (1996) and the Ar-Ar ages of Sherlock et al. (2003). All authors agreed that the c. 400 Ma ages probably record the culmination of Acadian shortening.

The older peak at about 422 Ma (Přídolí, latest Silurian) is more problematic. Evans (1996) correctly pointed out that these ages substantially predate the time of maximum burial, which probably occurred after deposition of some kilometres of Lower Devonian rocks (Soper & Woodcock 2003). Dong et al. (1997) saw these Přídolí ages as the beginning of Acadian shortening and metamorphism, but both Evans (1996) and Merriman et al. (1995) suggested instead that the ages record the prograde transition from smectite to illite during burial. These early ages closely match the main 423 Ma peak of Ar-Ar ages (Fig. 8a) from the NW–SE-striking cleavage in the Charnwood inlier of the East Midlands (Carney et al. 2008). The latter authors linked the late Silurian ages to a pre-Acadian shortening event that was due to Iapetus closure, an event recognized as the Brabantian deformation in Belgium (Debacker et al. 2005).

Here we regard the 405–395 Ma peak as the best age estimate for the closure of the K-Ar system in cleavage-parallel illites or white micas as their host rocks were uplifted and cooled late in the Acadian shortening. It will be argued later that this shortening probably started earlier than 405 Ma, but not as early as 422 Ma. The cluster of earlier ages must mark a separate tectonothermal event, immediately after the soft closure of the UK sector of the Iapetus Ocean. It is unlikely that a strong component of the cleavage in northern England or Wales formed then, however, as there is no evidence for a two-stage history for the Acadian fabric.

The main slaty cleavage-forming deformation (D1) SE of the Iapetus Suture is sporadically affected by a later (D2), gently dipping crenulation cleavage and related folds, particularly in the Isle of Man and the northern part of the Lake District. This event has not been radiometrically dated.

Dating Siluro-Devonian magmatism

Regional spectra of Trans-Suture granite ages

Before focusing on the Devonian granites of northern England, it is helpful to review ages across the Trans-Suture suite as a whole (Fig. 8). Available ages for the granites and related lamprophyre dykes are shown as probability distribution functions on Figure 8c–g (from Miles et al. 2016 with added ages from Miles & Woodcock 2018 and Hines et al. 2018). To compensate for the different sizes of the plutons, the granite data have been weighted by the outcrop area of each pluton (or by the subsurface area for the North Pennine batholith). The coloured Rb-Sr and K-Ar distributions have been adjusted upwards by 1.9% and 1% respectively, in line with the revised decay constants discussed above. The unadjusted curves are also shown as pecked lines.

The U-Pb zircon ages for the granites have peaks between 414 and 399 Ma (Fig. 8g). Only the later half of this magmatic range overlaps with the Acadian shortening peak based on adjusted K-Ar cleavage ages (405–395 Ma).

Compared with the U-Pb ages, more of the Rb-Sr ages for the granites (Fig. 8f) are from older analytical studies, where doubts about reliability arise because of less sophisticated methods and higher analytical errors. However, the adjusted age spectrum is compatible with that from U-Pb ages, with similar peaks at 405 and 399 Ma, but with an even greater proportion of the ages pre-dating the Acadian event. By contrast, aggregated K-Ar ages from the granites are younger than ages from the other two methods, even after 1% adjustment (Fig. 8e). These ages might record the very end of granite cooling, resetting late in the Acadian event, or merely an unreliability of K-Ar ages in granite biotite.

The remaining probability distribution functions are for K-Ar biotite ages (Fig. 8c) and U-Pb zircon ages (Fig. 8d) in the suite of lamprophyre dykes that intrude much of the Trans-Suture zone. The field and petrological evidence, reviewed by Brown et al. (2008), suggests that these dykes are coeval with the Trans-Suture granites, probably representing the more mafic mantle melts that triggered the crustal melts for the granitic magmatism. This genetic link is supported by the similarity of the lamprophyre and granite age ranges. Miles et al. (2016) explain the lack of Acadian resetting of the lamprophyre K-Ar ages by the low Ar diffusion rates in Mg-rich biotite.

In summary then, the age spectra from both the granites and related lamprophyres suggest that magmatism first preceded then overlapped with the Acadian deformation peak. This result conflicts with the field evidence to be discussed below, which shows rather that most plutons were emplaced late in the Acadian deformation history. Two explanations will be developed later in this paper: (1) that Acadian deformation began some millions of years before the date recorded by the closure of the K-Ar system in the cleavage-parallel illite/mica; and (2) that some early zircon ages from granites are dating crystallisation in a mid-crustal mush zone, millions of years before upper crustal emplacement of that granite.

Detailed age analysis of the northern England Trans-Suture granites

This section looks in more detail at the available ages for the northern England plutons of the Trans-Suture suite. Because these ages derive from a range of isotopic systems, they have been plotted against the approximate closure temperature for the system concerned (Fig. 9). On these plots, error bars are given both for the age determination and for the closure temperature, using the estimates compiled by Dickin (2005). The plots contain relevant radiometric age determinations published since 1970, but caution must be exercised in interpreting ages from older studies, where analytical techniques were less sophisticated and less accurate.

Fig. 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Plots of radiometric age against closure temperature for the late Caledonian granites of northern England. Each data point is annotated with its source: Al87, Al Jawadi (1987); Co88, Cooper et al. (1988); Da05, Davidson et al. (2005); Ho70, Holland & Lambert (1970); Ki10, Kimbell et al. (2010); Mi18, Miles & Woodcock (2018); Pi78, Pidgeon & Aftalion (1978); Ru82, Rundle (1982); Ru87, Rundle (1987); Ru92, Rundle (1992); Se08, Selby et al. (2008); Sh76, Shepherd et al. (1976); Sh81, Shepherd & Darbyshire (1981); Wa78, Wadge et al. (1978).

Radiometric ages are available from two exposed plutons (Shap and Skiddaw), from a subsurface pluton (Weardale) and from the aureole of an inferred pluton (Crummock Water). There are no ages from the Ulpha pluton or the possible Haweswater pluton. The best estimate of emplacement age for each pluton, discussed below, is shown on the summary diagram (Fig. 7) and ranges from 408 to 399 Ma. It will be argued later that cooling and final solidification of most of the upper crustal plutons took place in less than a million years. Therefore, this age range shows that each pluton results from a discrete emplacement event rather than from a synchronous event across the whole of northern England.

The evidence for the emplacement age of each dated pluton is now reviewed.

The buried Weardale pluton has a U-Pb zircon age (isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry; ID-TIMS) of 399.3 ± 0.7 Ma (Fig. 9a) (Kimbell et al. 2010). This age is within error of a Re-Os age of 398.3 ± 1.6 Ma on molybdenite in a hydrothermal quartz vein (Selby et al. 2008) that must post-date granite emplacement. An Rb-Sr whole rock age from an aplite vein of 397 ± 8 Ma (1.9% adjusted from Holland & Lambert 1970) is compatible with the U-Pb and Re-Os ages. An Rb-Sr age of 418 ± 10 Ma from the main granite published by the same authors might seem anomalously old were it not for the growing evidence from the Shap granite that the northern England magmas had a long pre-emplacement history in the mid-crust. We agree with Kimbell et al. (2010) that the U-Pb age of 399.3 ± 0.7 Ma is the best estimate of the emplacement age of the Weardale pluton.

The Skiddaw pluton had a very similar emplacement age to the Weardale pluton, based on a U-Pb ID-TIMS age on zircon of 398.8 ± 0.4 Ma (Selby et al. 2008) (Fig. 9b). The zircons picked for their analysis were small acicular grains that probably grew late in the magmatic history. Within error of the U-Pb age is an adjusted Rb-Sr age of 406 ± 8 Ma on granite K-feldspar (Rundle 1982) and adjusted K-Ar ages on granite biotite and muscovite of 396 ± 4 and 398 ± 8 Ma respectively (Shepherd et al. 1976; Rundle 1982). An adjusted Rb-Sr whole-rock age of 390 ± 4 Ma is anomalously young (Rundle 1982). Hydrothermal quartz veins that cross-cut granite and country rock give a significantly younger Re-Os age on molybdenite of 392 ± 3 Ma (Selby et al. 2008). This age is compatible with an Rb-Sr age on vein quartz fluid inclusions of 399 ± 5 Ma (Shepherd & Darbyshire 1981) and with a K-Ar age of 391 ± 2 Ma on muscovite in greisen marginal to the granite (Rundle 1982).

The Shap pluton has a more complex radiometric age record than the Weardale and Skiddaw plutons. The best direct estimate of its emplacement age is the Re-Os age on disseminated magmatic molybdenite of 405.2 ± 1.8 Ma (Selby et al. 2008) (Fig. 9c). An Rb-Sr whole-rock age of 402 ± 3 Ma (Wadge et al. 1978) and a K-Ar age on granite biotite of 401 ± 7 Ma (Rundle 1992) are both compatible with this emplacement age when recalculated to new decay constants. Nearly compatible are averaged Rb-Sr whole-rock ages on the comagmatic Devonian minor intrusive suite around Shap (Al Jawadi 1987; Rundle 1987), recalculated at 400 ± 3 Ma, but an early U-Pb zircon age of 390 ± 7 Ma (Pidgeon & Aftalion 1978) seems anomalously young. Also within the main granite, a more modern Rb-Sr age (Davidson et al. 2005) on the conspicuous K-feldspar phenocrysts, recalculated at 413 ± 2 Ma, suggests that these grains started to grow up to 10 million years before the pluton was emplaced in the upper crust. This hypothesis is supported by U-Pb ages on single zircon grains analysed by ion microprobe (Miles et al. 2016; Miles & Woodcock 2018). These grains have a mean age of 415.6 ± 1.4 Ma and individual ages ranging from 428 ± 8 Ma to 403 ± 10 Ma, suggesting a protracted magmatic history in the lower and mid-crust before rapid upper crustal emplacement. Only the youngest of these grains puts any constraint on this emplacement age, and is compatible with the 405 Ma Re-Os age. The new zircon data therefore support the conclusion of Selby et al. (2008) that the Shap pluton was emplaced about 6 million years earlier than those at Skiddaw and Weardale.

The buried Wensleydale pluton has an Rb-Sr age that recalculates as 408 ± 10 Ma (Dunham 1974). This age is within error of the emplacement ages of the Shap, Skiddaw or Weardale plutons. However, a Devonian emplacement age for the Wensleydale pluton has been questioned (e.g. by Millward et al. 2000) for several reasons: its cleaved margin, its low heat production and its geochemical similarity to the Ordovician plutons of the Lake District. A new U-Pb zircon age of 449 ± 0.52 Ma (C. Thomas et al. pers. comm. 2018) has verified this Ordovician age.

The Crummock Water pluton is postulated from its gravity signature and from the metasomatically bleached aureole in the overlying Skiddaw Group mudrocks (Millward 2002). This aureole gave an Rb-Sr age that recalculates to 409 ± 3 Ma (Cooper et al. 1988) (Fig. 9d), an age only just within error of the Shap pluton and significantly older than the Skiddaw and Weardale granites.

There are no radiometric ages available from the subsurface Ulpha and Haweswater plutons.

Discussion of the ages of Devonian plutons

The best estimate of emplacement age for each Devonian granite pluton in northern England is summarized on Figure 7 and ranges from 408 to 398 Ma. Comparing these ages with the cleavage ages highlights the paradox that emplacement of the Shap and Crummock Water plutons radiometrically predates the cleavage that the plutons physically truncate or metasomatise in the field. The reliability of the Crummock Water age might be doubted as an older Rb-Sr whole rock age, but the Shap age is based on more modern U-Pb, Re-Os and Rb-Sr mineral techniques. The age paradox therefore prompts consideration of what the radiometric ages mean in relation to a possibly protracted period of emplacement or cleavage formation. Estimates of the duration of emplacement and deformation are attempted in the next section.

The early U-Pb zircon ages from the Shap pluton have been discussed by Miles & Woodcock (2018). The large (±10 Ma) errors on the ages of individual grains makes it statistically possible that all these grains form a single population with mean age of about 416 Ma. However, Miles & Woodcock (2018) considered it more likely that they record protracted crystallisation in a mid-crustal mush zone throughout much of Early Devonian time, as evidence from other granitic plutons suggests (e.g. Coleman et al. 2004; Glazner et al. 2004). Miles & Woodcock (2018) envisage that this mush reservoir was intersected by steep strike-slip faults at about 405 Ma and that a crystal-rich mush close to the solidus temperature was piped up into the upper crust at a releasing bend in the strike-slip system. The other pipe-shaped Devonian plutons in northern England were probably emplaced in a similar way (Kimbell et al. 2010), analogous to other Caledonide examples in Donegal (Hutton 1982), the Grampian terrane (Jacques & Reavy 1994) and more generally (Hutton & Reavy 1992). In northern England, the solidified mush zone is thought to be preserved at about 10 km depth as a component of the North Pennine and Lake District batholiths.

The exposed Shap pluton has three main textural varieties (Stages I, II and III, Grantham 1928). The abundance of orthoclase megacrysts increases from 15% in Stage I, to 30% in Stage II and up to 60% in Stage III. Contacts between Stages I and II are often diffuse, but rafts of Stage I granite within the younger Stage II granite suggested to Grantham that the Stage II variety post-dated Stage I. However, no significant difference in zircon ages has been found between the Stage I and II granite (Miles & Woodcock 2018, fig. 5) and we have found contacts where the darker Stage I variety locally post-dates Stage II (Fig. 6g and h). This evidence suggests that both varieties coexisted in the same melt body. The typically diffuse contacts suggest that juxtaposition of the two varieties happened in the mid-crustal mush zone or, less likely, in very quick succession in the upper crust. The Stage III granite is a minor constituent of the pluton and is found as 1 cm to 1 m wide dyke-like bodies that cross-cut Stages I and II with sharp margins.

Durations of emplacement and deformation

Duration of granite pluton emplacement

The likely duration of cooling of a cylindrical pluton can be estimated from conductive cooling models such as those explained by Best & Christiansen (2001, pp. 198–199), assuming that the pluton was emplaced into its final upper crustal site in one episode.

The characteristic time τ is the time for the temperature difference between the centre of the pluton and the far-field country rock to reduce to 1/e (36.8%) of its initial value. For a cylindrical plutonτ=κt/a2 where κ is the thermal conductivity, t = time and a = pluton radius. Figure 10a shows the cooling times plotted against average pluton radius for various values of τ and for an appropriate thermal conductivity for the granite and the country rocks of 10−6 m2 s−1. Apart from the large Weardale pluton, the cooling times for the northern England plutons are low; they would be 95% cooled within 2.5 myr and 63% cooled within a million years. Even Weardale would be 63% cooled in less than 6 myr.

Fig. 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 10.

(a) Plot of duration of cooling against pluton radius for three multiples of the characteristic time. Sizes of northern England plutons are arrowed. (b) Plot of duration of Acadian deformation against strain rate for three values of finite shortening across the cleavage. Arrowed strain rates are from GPS-constrained studies in active orogenic belts: Himalaya (Allmendinger et al. 2007), Japan (Sagiya et al. 2000) and New Zealand (Beavan & Haines 2001).

For Shap specifically, the average radius at 2 km depth is about 2 km and the cooling time is given by t = 0.127τ myr. In the area to the west of Shap, illite crystallinity studies (British Geological Survey 1998) show that the country rock had reached mid-anchizone grade by the time of granite emplacement, corresponding to a temperature of 250°C (Kisch 1987). The Shap magma probably intruded at a temperature of about 650°C, close to solidus temperature, giving an initial temperature difference with respect to the country rock of 400°C. As the pluton cooled and the local wall rocks heated, the temperature difference with the far-field country rock would have reduced to 37% of its initial value at τ = 1, corresponding to a duration of 127 000 years. Thirty-seven percent of 400 C is 147°C, implying that the centre of the pluton would then have cooled to 397°C, well below solidus temperatures. Cooling equivalent to τ = 3, when the differential temperature would have reduced to 5% of its initial value, would have been achieved in only 300 000 years.

The rapid cooling times for the Shap pluton require a very short time gap between the upper crustal intrusion of the Stage I and Stage II magmas, or require that these two textural varieties were brought together in the mid-crustal much zone, to be emplaced together into the upper crust.

Duration of the Acadian deformation

The likely duration of the Acadian deformation can be estimated by dividing the accumulated finite strain by a plausible strain rate based on modern contractional or transpressional orogens.

The best indicators of the amount of Acadian shortening in northern England are the accretionary lapilli shapes in the Borrowdale Volcanic Group measured by Bell (1981). These lapilli suggest shortening perpendicular to the cleavage of 50–70%, a result very similar to wider compilations of cleavage in the Caledonian belt (Ramsay & Wood 1973).

Strain rates in contractional orogens vary from 10−12 to 10−16 s−1 but in strike-slip orogens have a narrower range from 10−14 to 10−15 s−1 (Campbell-Stone 2002). Some strain rates that are well constrained by GPS measurements are shown on Figure 10b, and fall within the range from 1.5 to 6.5 × 10−15 s−1. At these rates, 60% Acadian shortening in northern England would have taken between 3 and 10 myr to accumulate (Fig. 7).

Significance of the emplacement and deformation rates

The estimates of the duration of emplacement and deformation (Fig. 7) are helpful in clarifying that the Acadian deformation was more protracted than the emplacement of any one late Devonian pluton. The modelling suggests that the Acadian folding and cleavage probably developed over 3 to 10 myr, whereas all plutons except for Weardale appear to have been emplaced in the upper crust and solidified in less than a million years. Even Weardale was 63% cooled in less than 6 myr (Fig. 10a).

The rate estimates therefore suggest an explanation for the paradox that the K-Ar ages on the Acadian cleavage, locally and regionally, are younger than the emplacement age of the Shap pluton, even though the pluton truncates the cleavage in the country rocks. The paradox is resolved if the Acadian cleavage took as long as 10 myr to evolve, with the K-Ar age recording only the end of this deformation, when overburden was eroded, the deformed rocks cooled, and the K-Ar system closed. The local K-Ar age on the cleavage of 401 ± 7 Ma allows deformation to have started as early as 411 Ma and to have been in progress for 6 myr before the emplacement of the Shap pluton at about 405 Ma (Fig. 7).

The cooling estimates above assume that each cylindrical pluton was emplaced in one event, with the textural and geochronological complexity of a pluton such as Shap being inherited from the mid-crustal mush zone (Miles & Woodcock 2018). If, alternatively, such plutons were built up incrementally in the upper crust by a series of sill or dyke intrusions, then the cooling time of each magma batch would be an order of magnitude shorter; tens of thousands of years only (e.g. Barboni et al. 2015). The spread of the U-Pb zircon ages in the Shap pluton could then be interpreted as upper crustal emplacement of successive magma batches over 10 million years or more, comparable with larger granitic plutons such as the Tuolumne Suite in California (Coleman et al. 2004; Glazner et al. 2004).

This incremental emplacement model is implausible because of the paucity of sharp chilled contacts between different magma batches in the Shap pluton. Figure 6g and h shows local examples of sharp contacts, which would conventionally be interpreted as chilling of a later phenocryst-poor batch (‘Stage I’) against an earlier phenocryst-rich batch (‘Stage II’). However the veining in Figure 6h suggests that the Stage II facies was indeed the later component. We therefore reinterpret the apparent chills as mica-rich schlieren formed by filter-pressing at the margin of the Stage I melt (Weinberg et al. 2001; Paterson et al. 2018), probably because it still contained substantial interstitial melt. Both magma batches probably coexisted as crystal-rich mushes in the mid-crust, not in the upper crust.

Discussion

This review has considered the dating of the Acadian deformation in northern England and of the Devonian granites that overlapped with that deformation in both space and time. The central conclusion is that the cluster of K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages recalculated at 404–394 Ma (Emsian, Early Devonian; Figs 7 and 9) provides a good estimate of the end of the Acadian deformation. However, that deformation must already have been in progress for some millions of years in order to satisfy the observed field relations wherein the Acadian cleavage is truncated at the margins of the Shap and other granites. The granitic plutons themselves were rapidly emplaced and cooled into these country rocks, mostly in less than a million years.

There is, however, a second hypothesis that needs to be considered: that the main cleavage-forming ‘Acadian’ deformation is dated by the earlier cluster of K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages at about 419–426 Ma (late Ludlow and Přídolí, late Silurian). This hypothesis naturally satisfies the field relations that the cleavage is truncated and thermally overprinted at the margins of the Shap and Skiddaw granites and in the Crummock and Ulpha metasomatic aureoles. However, a late Silurian age for the Acadian deformation presents the following problems:

  1. The late Silurian does not correspond to the regional Acadian unconformity: the gap in deposition during which pre-Acadian rocks were deformed, uplifted and eroded. Where it is best constrained, in South Wales and the Welsh Borderland (Avalonia), this unconformity spans intra-Emsian through Frasnian time, at most 407–372 Ma (Figs 7 and 9). It therefore begins at least 12 myr after the end of the late Silurian radiometric resetting episode.

  2. It might be argued that the unconformity in northern England (Leinster–Lakesman terrane or Ganderia) is wider, and begins in Přídolí time. However, illite crystallinity data show that at the time the Acadian cleavage developed, the Silurian rocks in northern England had an overburden of at least 3.5 km of uppermost Silurian and lower Devonian rocks (Soper & Woodcock 2003), so a late Silurian cleavage age is implausible.

  3. A late Silurian age for the Acadian deformation conflicts with the evidence around the Shap and Skiddaw plutons that shortening continued after emplacement of the plutons and whilst their metamorphic aureoles developed (Soper & Roberts 1971; Boulter & Soper 1973; Soper & Kneller 1990).

For these reasons, the Emsian (Early Devonian) age is preferred here for the main Acadian deformation in northern England and Wales. The cause of the end-Silurian cluster of ages is still debatable. The suggestion of Evans (1996) and Merriman et al. (1995) that the ages record the prograde transition from smectite to illite during burial is appealing. However, a late Silurian cluster of Ar-Ar ages with a peak at 423 Ma has been obtained from the NW–SE striking cleavage in the Charnwood inlier of the East Midlands (Carney et al. 2008). These ages seem to record substantial late Silurian shortening in the Anglian Basin on the northeast margin of the Midland Platform. The possibility that this shortening also affected the Welsh Basin and the basins of the Lakes-Leinster terrane cannot be discounted. However, any late Silurian shortening seems not to have been enough to terminate deposition, only to have reduced subsidence rates in these basins and to promote a facies change from marine to non-marine (Soper & Woodcock 2003). Eastward from the Anglian Basin, the Brabant Massif was also deformed in late Silurian and Lower Devonian time (426–393 Ma; Debacker et al. 2005), in the event termed the Brabantian.

The D1 and D2 deformation sequence in the Lake District Massif, supposed here to be Acadian, was correlated by Simpson (1963, 1967) with the similar sequence on the Isle of Man, a structural correlation broadly supported by more recent studies (Fitches et al. 1999; Morris et al. 1999; Power & Barnes 1999). The most recent mapping of the Isle of Man (Chadwick et al. 2001) regards D1 and D2 as ‘Acadian’ but of late Silurian or early Devonian age. D1 and D2 must pre-date the weakly deformed Peel Sandstone Group, then thought to be about 400–410 Ma (Pragian to Emsian), on the basis of its 29 ± 5 palaeolatitude estimated palaeomagnetically (Piper & Crowley 1999). This age for the Peel Group would be compatible with the 404–394 Ma age for the Acadian deformation in northern England if the Peel Group was at the later Emsian end of the palaeomagnetically allowable range. However, whilst a subsequently identified Scoyenia ichnofacies assemblage indicates a latest Silurian to Early Devonian age, a spore microflora suggests a more specific late Lochkovian to Pragian age for the Peel Group (Crowley et al. 2009). This age is incompatible with the evidence from northern England, and the necessary conclusion is that D1 and D2 in northern England and the Isle of Man are not time correlatives. The northern England ‘Acadian’ deformation is 404–394 Ma (Emsian) whereas the Isle of Man deformation is pre-end Pragian, so at least 408 Ma, possibly equivalent to the 419–426 Ma (late Ludlow and Přídolí, late Silurian) radiometric ages from England and Wales already discussed.

Interpretation of deformation timing in the Isle of Man has recently been further complicated by a Late Ordovician U-Pb zircon age of 457.2 ± 1.2 Ma from the Dhoon Granodiorite (Fritschle et al. 2018). These authors quote Power & Barnes (1999) as concluding that this granite was intruded during or after the D1 deformation, implying that D1 must be an Ordovician event. In fact, Power & Barnes (1999) observed that porphyroblasts in the aureole to the Dhoon pluton, flattened in the S1 cleavage and replaced by chlorite and biotite, suggest that ‘…the Dhoon Granodiorite was formed pre- or possibly syn-D1.' So a late Silurian or Early Devonian age for D1 is still compatible with the new age for the Dhoon pluton. Furthermore, Fritschle et al. (2018) do not mention that the D1 to D3 structural sequence in the Ordovician Manx Group is also present in the Wenlock (mid-Silurian) Dalby Group, precluding a pre-late Silurian age for the main deformation on the Isle of Man.

A late Silurian or Early Devonian ‘Acadian’ deformation can be traced into the Balbriggan inlier of eastern Ireland (Murphy 1987), through the Slieve Phelim and Galtee Mountains inliers of central Ireland (Phillips 2001) to the Dingle Peninsula of the west coast (Todd 2015). To the SW, in the Leinster Massif, U-Pb zircon ages (Fritschle et al. 2018) show that the D1 deformation in the Ribband Group is about 460 Ma (late Middle Ordovician) in age rather than Acadian as previously thought. Deformation in the unconformably overlying Duncannon Group may still be Acadian.

Conclusions

  1. A review of the field evidence shows that the Devonian plutons in northern England were intruded after most – but not all – of the Acadian folding and cleavage formation had occurred.

  2. U-Pb zircon and Re-Os molybdenite ages (Selby et al. 2008; Kimbell et al. 2010) suggest that the Skiddaw and Weardale plutons were emplaced at about 399 Ma, but the Shap pluton earlier at about 405 Ma.

  3. The K-Ar age on the Acadian cleavage in northern England of 397 ± 7 Ma (Merriman et al. 1995) and K-Ar and Ar-Ar ages from Wales ranging from 400 to 390 Ma are just compatible with the emplacement ages of Skiddaw and Weardale, but incompatible with emplacement of Shap at 405 Ma. Adjustment of these ages upwards by 1% in line with the revised decay constant increases the local K-Ar age to 401 ± 7 Ma and the regional range from 404 to 394 Ma (Emsian, Lower Devonian); this is still younger than the Shap emplacement age, but is more compatible with it within error.

  4. Assessment of the thermal history of the northern England plutons show that they mostly cooled within a million years, with only the Weardale pluton having a more protracted cooling history.

  5. By contrast, the Acadian deformation probably lasted from 3 to 10 myr, offering a solution to the age paradox around the Shap pluton. Folds and cleavage may have been forming for as much as 10 myr before the closure of the K-Ar isotopic system at about 401 Ma.

  6. An earlier cluster of K-Ar and Ar-Ar cleavage ages at 426–420 Ma (Ludlow to Přídolí, late Silurian) is problematic, as it falls before the regional unconformity marking Acadian deformation, uplift and erosion.

  7. A cluster of U-Pb zircon ages from the Shap pluton averaging 415.6 ± 1.4 Ma is thought not to relate to pluton emplacement. Rather, these ages are considered to record zircon crystallisation in a mid-crustal mush zone kept near solidus temperature for much of Early Devonian time, and which was eventually the source for the upper crustal plutons

Acknowledgements

We thank the Armstrongs Group for access to the Shap Pink Quarry, Richard Hinton and the NERC EMMAC group at Edinburgh for help during the acquisition of zircon U-Pb ages, and Chris Thomas and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Scientific editing by Stewart Molyneux

  • © 2019 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London for the Yorkshire Geological Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

References

  1. ↵
    1. Al Jawadi, A.F.
    1987. Minor Igneous Intrusions of the Lake District; Geochronology, Geochemistry and Petrology. PhD thesis, Newcastle University, UK.
  2. ↵
    1. Allmendinger, R.W.,
    2. Reilinger, R. &
    3. Loveless, J.
    2007. Strain and rotation rate from GPS in Tibet, Anatolia, and the Altiplano. Tectonics, 26, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006TC002030
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson, P.
    2015. Zonation and Emplacement of the Newry Igneous Complex, Northern Ireland. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
  4. ↵
    1. Barboni, M.,
    2. Annen, C. &
    3. Schoene, B.
    2015. Evaluating the construction and evolution of upper crustal magma reservoirs with coupled U/Pb zircon geochronology and thermal modeling: A case study from the Mt. Capanne pluton (Elba, Italy). Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 432, 436–448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.09.043
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Beavan, J. &
    2. Haines, J.
    2001. Contemporary horizontal velocity and strain rate fields of the Pacific-Australian plate boundary zone through New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 106, 741–770, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900302
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bell, A.M.
    1981. Strain factorizations from lapilli tuff, English Lake District. Journal of the Geological Society, 138, 463–474, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.138.4.0463
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Best, M.G. &
    2. Christiansen, E.H.
    2001. Igneous Petrology. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts.
  8. ↵
    1. Boulter, C.A. &
    2. Soper, N.J.
    1973. Structural relations of the Shap Granite. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 39, 365–369, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.39.3.365
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. British Geological Survey
    1996. Tectonic Map of Britain, Ireland and Adjacent Areas. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  10. ↵
    1. British Geological Survey
    1998. Ambleside, England & Wales Sheet 40. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  11. ↵
    1. British Geological Survey
    2004. Appleby, England & Wales Sheet 30. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  12. ↵
    1. British Geological Survey
    2007. Kendal, England & Wales Sheet 39. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  13. ↵
    1. Brown, P.E.,
    2. Soper, N.J. &
    3. Miller, J.A.
    1964. Age of the principal intrusions of the Lake District. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 34, 331–342, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.34.3.331
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Brown, P.E.,
    2. Miller, J.A. &
    3. Grasty, R.L.
    1968. Isotopic ages of late Caledonian granitic intrusions in the British Isles. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 36, 251–276, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.36.3.251
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Brown, P.E.,
    2. Ryan, P.D.,
    3. Soper, N.J. &
    4. Woodcock, N.H.
    2008. The Newer Granite problem revisited: a transtensional origin for the Early Devonian trans-suture suite. Geological Magazine, 145, 235–256, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756807004219
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Campbell-Stone, E.A
    . 2002. Realistic geologic strain rates. In: 2002 GSA Annual Conference abstracts. Paper No. 165-33. Denver, Colorado.
  17. ↵
    1. Carney, J.N.,
    2. Alexandre, P.,
    3. Pringle, M.S.,
    4. Pharaoh, T.C.,
    5. Merriman, R.J. &
    6. Kemp, S.J.
    2008. 40Ar-39Ar isotope constraints on the age of deformation in Charnwood Forest, UK. Geological Magazine, 145, 702–713, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756808004950
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Chadwick, R.A.,
    2. Jackson, D.I. et al.
    2001. Geology of the Isle of Man and its offshore area. British Geological Survey Research Report RR/01/06. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  19. ↵
    1. Coleman, D.S.,
    2. Gray, W. &
    3. Glazner, A.F.
    2004. Rethinking the emplacement and evolution of zoned plutons: Geochronologic evidence for incremental assembly of the Tuolumne Intrusive Suite, California. Geology, 32, 433–436, https://doi.org/10.1130/G20220.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Cooper, D.C.,
    2. Lee, M.K.,
    3. Fortey, N.J.,
    4. Cooper, A.H.,
    5. Rundle, C.C.,
    6. Webb, B.C. &
    7. Allen, P.M.
    1988. The Crummock Water aureole: a zone of metasomatism and source of ore metals in the English Lake District. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 145, 523–540, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.145.4.0523
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Crowley, S.F.,
    2. Higgs, K.T.,
    3. Piper, J.D.A. &
    4. Morrissey, L.B.
    2009. Age of the Peel Sandstone Group, Isle of Man. Geological Journal, 44, 57–78, https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.1129
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Davidson, J.,
    2. Charlier, B.,
    3. Hora, J.M. &
    4. Perlroth, R.
    2005. Mineral isochrons and isotopic fingerprinting: Pitfalls and promises. Geology, 33, 29–32, https://doi.org/10.1130/G21063.1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Debacker, T.N.,
    2. Dewaele, S.,
    3. Sintubin, M.,
    4. Verniers, J.,
    5. Muchez, P. &
    6. Boven, A.
    2005. Timing and duration of the progressive deformation of the Brabant Massif, Belgium. Geologica Belgica, 8, 20–34.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Dickin, A.P.
    2005. Radiogenic Isotope Geology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  25. ↵
    1. Dong, H.,
    2. Hall, C.M.,
    3. Halliday, A.N.,
    4. Peacor, D.R.,
    5. Merriman, R.J. &
    6. Roberts, B.
    1997. 40Ar/39Ar illite dating of Late Caledonian (Acadian) metamorphism and cooling of K-bentonites and slates from the Welsh Basin, U.K. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 150, 337–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00100-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Dunham, K.C.
    1974. Granite beneath the Pennines in North Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 40, 191–194, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.40.2.191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Dunham, K.C.,
    2. Dunham, A.C.,
    3. Hodge, B.L. &
    4. Johnson, G.A.L.
    1965. Granite beneath Visean sediments with mineralization at Rookhope, northern Pennines. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 121, 383–414, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.121.1.0383
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Evans, J.A.
    1996. Dating the transition of smectite to illite in Palaeozoic mudrocks using the Rb-Sr whole-rock technique. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 153, 101–108, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.153.1.0101
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Fitches, W.R.,
    2. Barnes, R.P. &
    3. Morris, J.H.
    1999. Geological structure and tectonic evolution of the Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the Isle of Man. In: Woodcock, N.H., Quirk, D.G., Fitches, W.R. & Barnes, R.P. (eds) In Sight of the Suture: the Palaeozoic geology of the Isle of Man in its Iapetus Ocean context. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 160, 259–287, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.160.01.18
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Fritschle, T.,
    2. Daly, J.S. et al.
    2018. Peri-Gondwanan Ordovician arc magmatism in southeastern Ireland and the Isle of Man: Constraints on the timing of Caledonian deformation in Ganderia. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 130, 1918–1939, https://doi.org/10.1130/B31949.1
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Glazner, A.F.,
    2. Bartley, J.M.,
    3. Coleman, D.S.,
    4. Gray, W. &
    5. Taylor, R.Z.
    2004. Are plutons assembled over millions of years by amalgamation from small magma chambers? GSA Today, 14, 4–12, https://doi.org/10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<0004:APAOMO>2.0.CO;2
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Grantham, D.R.
    1928. The petrology of the Shap Granite. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 39, 299–331, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7878(28)80015-0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Hines, R.,
    2. Paterson, S.R.,
    3. Memeti, V. &
    4. Chambers, J.A.
    2018. Nested incremental growth of zoned upper crustal plutons in the Southern Uplands Terrane, UK: fractionating, mixing, and contaminated magma fingers. Journal of Petrology, 59, 483–516, https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egy034
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Holland, J.G. &
    2. Lambert, R.S.J.
    1970. Weardale granite. Transactions of the Natural History Society of Northumberland, Durham, and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 41, 103–118.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Hutton, D.H.W.
    1982. A tectonic model for the emplacement of the main Donegal granite, N.W. Ireland. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 139, 615–631, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.139.5.0615
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Hutton, D.H.W. &
    2. Reavy, R.J.
    1992. Strike-slip tectonics and granite petrogenesis. Tectonics, 11, 960–967, https://doi.org/10.1029/92TC00336
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Jacques, J.M. &
    2. Reavy, R.J.
    1994. Caledonian plutonism and major lineaments in the SW Scottish Highlands. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 151, 955–969, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.151.6.0955
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Jourdan, F.,
    2. Marzoli, A. et al.
    2009. 40Ar/39Ar ages of CAMP in North America: Implications for the Triassic–Jurassic boundary and the 40K decay constant bias. Lithos, 110, 167–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.12.011
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Kimbell, G.S.,
    2. Young, B.,
    3. Millward, D. &
    4. Crowley, Q.G.
    2010. The North Pennine batholith (Weardale Granite) of northern England: new data on its age and form. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 58, 107–128, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.58.1.273
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Kisch, H.J.
    1987. Correlation between indicators of very-low-grade metamorphism. In: Frey, M. (ed.) Low Temperature Metamorphism. Blackie & Son, Glasgow, 227–300.
  41. ↵
    1. Kulp, J.L.,
    2. Long, L.E.,
    3. Griffin, C.E.,
    4. Mills, A.A. &
    5. Lambert, R.
    1960. Potassium-argon and rubidium-strontium ages of some granites from Britain and Eire. Nature, 185, 495–497, https://doi.org/10.1038/185495a0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Leggett, J.K.,
    2. McKerrow, W.S. &
    3. Eales, M.H.
    1979. The Southern Uplands of Scotland: a Lower Palaeozoic accretionary prism. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 136, 755–770, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.136.6.0755
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. McKerrow, W.S.,
    2. MacNiocaill, C. &
    3. Dewey, J.T.
    2000. The Caledonian Orogeny redefined. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 157, 1149–1154, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs.157.6.1149
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Meere, P.A. &
    2. Mulchrone, K.F.
    2006. Timing of deformation within Old Red Sandstone lithologies from the Dingle Peninsula, SW Ireland. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 163, 461–469, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764905-099
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Merriman, R.J.,
    2. Rex, D.C.,
    3. Soper, N.J. &
    4. Peacor, D.
    1995. The age of Acadian cleavage in northern England, UK: K-Ar and TEM analysis of a Silurian metabentonite. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 50, 255–265, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.50.3.255
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Miles, A.J. &
    2. Woodcock, N.H.
    2018. A combined geochronological approach to investigating long lived granite magmatism: the Shap granite, UK. Lithos, 304–307, 245–257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2018.02.012
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Miles, A.J.,
    2. Woodcock, N.H. &
    3. Hawkesworth, C.J.
    2016. Tectonic controls on post-subduction granite genesis and emplacement: the late Caledonian suite of Britain and Ireland. Gondwana Research, 39, 250–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2016.02.006
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Millward, D.
    2002. Early Palaeozoic magmatism in the English Lake District. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 54, 65–93, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.54.2.65
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Millward, D.,
    2. Johnson, E.W.,
    3. Beddoe-Stephens, B.,
    4. Young, B.,
    5. Kneller, B.C.,
    6. Lee, M.K. &
    7. Fortey, N.J.
    2000. Geology of the Ambleside District. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheet 38 (England and Wales). The Stationery Office, London.
  50. ↵
    1. Morris, J.H.,
    2. Woodcock, N.H. &
    3. Howe, M.P.A.
    1999. The Silurian succession of the Isle of Man: the late Wenlock Niarbyl Formation, Dalby Group. In: Woodcock, N.H., Quirk, D.G., Fitches, W.R. & Barnes, R.P. (eds) In Sight of the Suture: the Palaeozoic geology of the Isle of Man in its Iapetus Ocean context. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 160, 189–211.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Murphy, F.C.
    1987. Late Caledonian granitoids and timing of deformation in the Iapetus suture zone of eastern Ireland. Geological Magazine, 124, 135–142, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800015946
    OpenUrlAbstract
  52. ↵
    1. Naumenko-Dèzes, M.O.,
    2. Nägler, T.F.,
    3. Mezger, K. &
    4. Villa, I.M.
    2018. Constraining the 40K decay constant with 87Rb-87Sr – 40K-40Ca chronometer intercomparison. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 220, 235–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.041
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Nebel, O.,
    2. Scherer, E.E. &
    3. Mezger, K.
    2011. Evaluation of the 87Rb decay constant by age comparison against the U–Pb system. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 301, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Paterson, S.R.,
    2. Ardill, K.,
    3. Vernon, R. &
    4. Žák, J.
    2018. A review of mesoscopic magmatic structures and their potential for evaluating the hypersolidus evolution of intrusive complexes. Journal of Structural Geology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.04.022
  55. ↵
    1. Phillips, W.E.A.
    2001. Caledonian deformation. In: Holland, C.H. (ed.) The Geology of Ireland. Dunedin Academic Press, Edinburgh, 179–199.
  56. ↵
    1. Pidgeon, R.G. &
    2. Aftalion, M.
    1978. Cogenetic and inherited zircon U-Pb systems in granites of Scotland and England. In: Bowes, D.R. & Leake, B.E. (eds) Crustal Evolution in Northwestern Britain and Adjacent Regions. Geological Journal, Special Issue, Seel House Press, Liverpool, 183–220.
  57. ↵
    1. Piper, J.D.A. &
    2. Crowley, S.F.
    1999. Palaeomagnetism of (Palaeozoic) Peel Sandstones and Langness Conglomerate Formation, Isle of Man: implications for the age and regional diagenesis of Manx red beds. In: Woodcock, N.H., Quirk, D.G., Fitches, W.R. & Barnes, R.P. (eds) In Sight of the Suture: the Palaeozoic geology of the Isle of Man in its Iapetus Ocean context. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 160, 213–226.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Pothier, H.D.,
    2. Waldron, J.W.,
    3. Schofield, D.I. &
    4. DuFrane, S.A.
    2015. Peri-Gondwanan terrane interactions recorded in the Cambrian–Ordovician detrital zircon geochronology of North Wales. Gondwana Research, 28, 987–1001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.08.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. Power, G.M. &
    2. Barnes, R.P.
    1999. Relationships between metamorphism and structure on the northern edge of Eastern Avalonia in the Manx Group, Isle of Man. In: Woodcock, N.H., Quirk, D.G., Fitches, W.R. & Barnes, R.P. (eds) In Sight of the Suture: the Palaeozoic geology of the Isle of Man in its Iapetus Ocean context. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 160, 289–305, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1999.160.01.19
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Ramsay, J.G. &
    2. Wood, D.S.
    1973. The geometric effects of volume change during deformation processes. Tectonophysics, 16, 263–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(73)90015-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Richmond, L.K. &
    2. Williams, B.P.J.
    2000. A new terrane in the Old Red Sandstone of the Dingle Peninsula, SW Ireland. In: Friend, P.F. & Williams, B.P.J. (eds) New Perspectives on the Old Red Sandstone. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 180, 147–183, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.180.01.09
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. Rundle, C.C.
    1982. The Chronology of Igneous Intrusion in the English Lake District. PhD thesis, University of London, UK.
  63. ↵
    1. Rundle, C.C.
    1987. Isotopic Analyses of Rocks from the English Lake District. Preliminary Report and Summary of Results from the 1986 Rock Collection. Report of the Isotope Geology Unit, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  64. ↵
    1. Rundle, C.C.
    1992. Review and assessment of isotopic ages from the English Lake District. Technical Report, British Geological Survey, WA/92/38, 1–27.
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Sagiya, T.,
    2. Miyazaki, S. &
    3. Tada, T.
    2000. Continuous GPS array and present-day crustal deformation of Japan. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 2303–2322, https://libsta28.lib.cam.ac.uk:2090/10.1007/PL00022507
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Selby, D.,
    2. Conliffe, J.,
    3. Crowley, Q.G. &
    4. Feely, M.
    2008. Geochronology (Re–Os and U–Pb) and fluid inclusion studies of molybdenite mineralisation associated with the Shap, Skiddaw and Weardale granites, UK. Applied Earth Science: Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy: Section B, 117, 11–28, https://doi.org/10.1179/174327508X309669
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Shepherd, T.J. &
    2. Darbyshire, D.P.F.
    1981. Fluid inclusion Rb–Sr isochrons for dating mineral deposits. Nature, 290, 578, https://doi.org/10.1038/290578a0
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Shepherd, T.J.,
    2. Beckinsale, R.D.,
    3. Rundle, C.C. &
    4. Durham, J.
    1976. Genesis of the Carrock Fell tungsten deposits, Cumbria: fluid inclusion and isotopic study. Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, B85, 63–73.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Sherlock, S.C.,
    2. Kelley, S.P.,
    3. Zalasiewicz, J.A.,
    4. Schofield, D.I.,
    5. Evans, J.A.,
    6. Merriman, R.J. &
    7. Kemp, S.J.
    2003. Precise dating of low-temperature deformation: Strain-fringe analysis by 40Ar-39Ar laser microprobe. Geology, 31, 219–222, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0219:PDOLTD>2.0.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Simpson, A.
    1963. The stratigraphy and tectonics of the Manx Slate Series, Isle of Man. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London, 119, 367–400, https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.119.1.0367
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Simpson, A.
    1967. The stratigraphy and tectonics of the Skiddaw Slates and the relationship of the overlying Borrowdale Volcanic Series in part of the Lake District. Geological Journal, 5, 391–418, https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350050211
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Soper, N.J. &
    2. Kneller, B.C.
    1990. Cleaved microgranite dykes of the Shap swarm in the Silurian of NW England. Geological Journal, 25, 161–170, https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3350250207
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Soper, N.J. &
    2. Roberts, D.E.
    1971. Age of cleavage in the Skiddaw Slates in relation to the Skiddaw aureole. Geological Magazine, 108, 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800051359
    OpenUrlAbstract
  74. ↵
    1. Soper, N.J. &
    2. Woodcock, N.H.
    2003. The lost Lower Old Red Sandstone of England and Wales: a record of post-Iapetan flexure or Early Devonian transtension? Geological Magazine, 140, 627–647, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756803008380
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Soper, N.J.,
    2. Webb, B.C. &
    3. Woodcock, N.H.
    1987. Late Caledonian (Acadian) transpression in north-west England: timing, geometry and geotectonic significance. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 46, 175–192, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.46.3.175
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Steiger, R. &
    2. Jäger, E.
    1977. Subcommission on geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geo-and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 36, 359–362, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(77)90060-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Stone, P.,
    2. Millward, D.,
    3. Young, B.,
    4. Merritt, J.W.,
    5. Clarke, S.M.,
    6. McCormac, M. &
    7. Lawrence, D.J.D.
    2010. British Regional Geology: Northern England. 5th edn. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  78. ↵
    1. Stone, P.,
    2. McMillan, A.A.,
    3. Floyd, J.D.,
    4. Barnes, R.P. &
    5. Phillips, E.R
    . 2012. British Regional Geology: South of Scotland. 4th edn. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham.
  79. ↵
    1. Todd, S.P.
    2015. Structure of the Dingle Peninsula, SW Ireland: evidence for the nature and timing of Caledonian, Acadian and Variscan tectonics. Geological Magazine, 152, 242–268, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756814000260
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. van Staal, C.R.,
    2. Dewey, J.F.,
    3. MacNiocaill, C. &
    4. McKerrow, W.S.
    1998. The Cambrian-Silurian tectonic evolution of the Northern Appalachians and Caledonides: history of a complex, west and southwest Pacific-type segment of Iapetus. In: Blundell, D.J. & Scott, A.C. (eds) Lyell: The Present Is the Key to the Past. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 199–242, https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.143.01.17
  81. ↵
    1. van Staal, C.R.,
    2. Whalen, J.B.,
    3. Valverde-Vaquero, P.,
    4. Zagorevski, A. &
    5. Rogers, N.
    2009. Pre-Carboniferous, episodic accretion-related, orogenesis along the Laurentian margin of the northern Appalachians. In: Murphy, J.B., Keppie, J.D. & Hynes, A.J. (eds) Ancient orogens and modern analogues. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 327, 271–316, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP327.13
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    1. Wadge, A.J.,
    2. Gale, N.H.,
    3. Beckinsale, R.D. &
    4. Rundle, C.C.
    1978. A Rb-Sr isochron for the Shap Granite. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 42, 297–305, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.42.2.297
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Waldron, J.W.F.,
    2. Schofield, D.I.,
    3. White, C.E. &
    4. Barr, S.M.
    2011. Cambrian successions of the Meguma Terrane, Nova Scotia, and Harlech Dome, North Wales: dispersed fragments of a peri-Gondwanan basin? Journal of the Geological Society, 168, 83–98, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492010-068
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Waldron, J.W.,
    2. Schofield, D.I. et al.
    2014. Ganderia–Laurentia collision in the Caledonides of Great Britain and Ireland. Journal of the Geological Society, 171, 555–569, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2013-131
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  85. ↵
    1. Weinberg, R.F.,
    2. Sial, A.N. &
    3. Pessoa, R.R.
    2001. Magma flow within the Tavares pluton, northeastern Brazil: Compositional and thermal convection. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113, 508–520, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(2001)113<0508:MFWTTP>2.0.CO;2
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Wilson, R.A.,
    2. van Staal, C.R. &
    3. Kamo, S.L.
    2017. Rapid transition from the Salinic to Acadian orogenic cycles in the northern Appalachian Orogen: Evidence from northern New Brunswick, Canada. American Journal of Science, 317, 449–482, https://doi.org/10.2475/04.2017.02
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Woodcock, N.H.
    2012. The Acadian Orogeny and its mid–late Devonian depositional aftermath. In: Woodcock, N.H. & Strachan, R.A. (eds) Geological History of Britain and Ireland. 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 210–229.
  88. ↵
    1. Woodcock, N.H. &
    2. Pharaoh, T.C.
    1993. Silurian facies beneath East Anglia. Geological Magazine, 130, 681–690, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800020999
    OpenUrlAbstract
  89. ↵
    1. Woodcock, N.H. &
    2. Soper, N.J.
    2006. The Acadian Orogeny: the mid-Devonian phase that formed slate belts in England and Wales. In: Brenchley, P. & Rawson, P.F. (eds) The Geology of England and Wales. Geological Society of London, 131–146.
  90. ↵
    1. Woodcock, N.H.,
    2. Soper, N.J. &
    3. Strachan, R.A.
    2007. A Rheic cause for the Acadian deformation in Europe. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 164, 1023–1036, https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-76492006-129
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological 				Society: 62 (4)
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
Volume 62, Issue 4
November 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation tools

Age of the Acadian deformation and Devonian granites in northern England: a review

Nigel H. Woodcock, N. Jack Soper and Andrew J. Miles
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 62, 238-253, 8 April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2018-009
Nigel H. Woodcock
1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nhw1@cam.ac.uk
N. Jack Soper
2Gams Bank, Threshfield, Skipton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Miles
3School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, University Road, , UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions
View PDF
Share

Age of the Acadian deformation and Devonian granites in northern England: a review

Nigel H. Woodcock, N. Jack Soper and Andrew J. Miles
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 62, 238-253, 8 April 2019, https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs2018-009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Email to

Thank you for sharing this Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Age of the Acadian deformation and Devonian granites in northern England: a review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
Download PPT
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Regional geological setting
    • The geology of Northern England
    • Field relations of the Trans-Suture granite plutons
    • Dating Acadian deformation
    • Dating Siluro-Devonian magmatism
    • Durations of emplacement and deformation
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Funding
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Similar Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A possible serpulid tube worm of the genus Filograna from the upper Permian Cadeby Formation of South Yorkshire, UK
  • Foraminifers in upper Viséan–lower Serpukhovian limestones (Mississippian) from South Wales: regional correlation and implications for British foraminiferal zonal schemes
  • Provenance of Carboniferous sandstones in the central and southern parts of the Pennine Basin, UK: evidence from detrital zircon ages
Show more: Research article
  • Most read
  • Most cited
Loading
  • Age of the Acadian deformation and Devonian granites in northern England: a review
  • Peter Crichton Robinson (1936–2019)
  • Emplacement of oil in the Devonian Weardale Granite of northern England
  • Cretaceous Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 in eastern England: further palynological and geochemical data from Melton Ross
  • Erratum for ‘The Chalk Group (Upper Cretaceous) of the Northern Province, eastern England – a review’, Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, 62, 153–177
More...

Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society

  • About the journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Author information
  • Supplementary Publications
  • Subscribe
  • Pay per view
  • Alerts & RSS
  • Copyright & Permissions
  • Activate Online Subscription
  • Feedback
  • Help

Lyell Collection

  • About the Lyell Collection
  • Lyell Collection homepage
  • Collections
  • Open Access Collection
  • Open Access Policy
  • Lyell Collection access help
  • Recommend to your Library
  • Lyell Collection Sponsors
  • MARC records
  • Digital preservation
  • Developing countries
  • Geofacets
  • Manage your account
  • Cookies

The Geological Society

  • About the Society
  • Join the Society
  • Benefits for Members
  • Online Bookshop
  • Publishing policies
  • Awards, Grants & Bursaries
  • Education & Careers
  • Events
  • Geoscientist Online
  • Library & Information Services
  • Policy & Media
  • Society blog
  • Contact the Society

 

Yorkshire Geological Society logo

Published by The Geological Society of London, registered charity number 210161

Print ISSN 
0044-0604
Online ISSN 
2041-4811

Copyright © 2021 Yorkshire Geological Society